Can USDT stay available in the US under the GENIUS Act? The foreign issuer path, the 2027 and 2028 deadlines, and what payment companies should ask now.
Under the GENIUS Act, USDT is a foreign-issued payment stablecoin. From January 18, 2027, US platforms can only make it available if its issuer can and will comply with US lawful orders. From July 18, 2028, they can only offer it to people in the US if Treasury finds the issuer's home regime comparable and the issuer registers with the OCC.
That path exists in the statute, but nobody has walked it yet. So the real question for a payments team is what happens to your USDT flows in each scenario.
This article summarizes the law and Treasury's proposed rules as of October 2, 2026. It is general information, not legal advice. Confirm your obligations with qualified counsel.
Key takeaways
For the wider law, the GENIUS Act explained for businesses covers reserves, yield, and the full rulemaking timeline. This page zooms in on the foreign issuer rules. To see which kind of provider sits where in a payment flow, start with the types of stablecoin APIs.
Yes. Section 2(12) of the GENIUS Act defines a foreign payment stablecoin issuer as one organized or domiciled outside the US (or in a US territory) that is not a permitted payment stablecoin issuer.
Tether says it moved to El Salvador after obtaining licenses there. USDT is not issued by a US bank subsidiary, a federal nonbank issuer, or a state-approved issuer. That puts it squarely in the foreign category.
Tether's answer for the US market is a second token. Anchorage Digital and Tether introduced USA₮ (USAT) on January 27, 2026. Anchorage Digital Bank, N.A. issues it under the oversight of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. USAT and USDT are different contracts with different issuers. A balance in one isn't a balance in the other.
The Act has two separate prohibitions, and they start on different dates. Treasury spells this out in its August 18, 2026 proposal, with comments due October 19, 2026.
| Date | Rule | Who it binds | What it means for USDT |
|---|---|---|---|
| January 18, 2027 | Section 3(b)(2): no offering, selling, or making available in the US a foreign-issued stablecoin unless the issuer can and will comply with lawful orders | Digital asset service providers | Platforms need a basis to believe Tether can freeze and comply on a US order |
| July 18, 2028 | Section 3(b)(1): no offering or selling to a person in the US unless the stablecoin comes from a permitted issuer or a foreign issuer that meets section 18 | Digital asset service providers | USDT stays available to US persons only if Tether qualifies under section 18 |
| Any time after a designation | Section 8: Treasury can designate a noncompliant foreign issuer and ban secondary trading of its token in the US | Digital asset service providers | A separate enforcement track, independent of the 2028 date |
On the first rule, the proposal lets a platform rely on the issuer's own representation that it can and will comply with lawful orders. Two conditions apply. The platform must do reasonable due diligence on that representation, and it can't rely on it if it knows or should know the claim is false.
The full GENIUS timeline, including the January 18, 2027 effective date, is in the business guide.
A foreign issuer escapes the section 3 prohibitions only if all four section 18(a) conditions hold:
The process has its own clock:
Treasury may also sign reciprocal arrangements with comparable jurisdictions, and the Act says it should complete them within two years of enactment. We found no published comparability determination as of October 2, 2026. Check Treasury's list before you assume one exists.
Section 8 gives Treasury a faster lever than the 2028 deadline. It can designate a foreign issuer as noncompliant, and the token loses US secondary trading.
The sequence:
Penalties are steep. A platform that knowingly keeps facilitating trading faces up to $100,000 per violation per day. A foreign issuer that keeps offering the token after the determination faces up to $1,000,000 per violation per day. Treasury can grant waivers, for example if a ban would hurt the US financial system or the issuer is taking real steps to fix the problem.
It depends on whether you serve people in the US and whether you act as a platform or use one.
The Act's rules bind digital asset service providers: firms that, for compensation, exchange digital assets for money or other digital assets, transfer them to third parties, or custody them, for people in the US. Exchanges, custodians, and most payout providers fit that description. A company that just pays its suppliers through such a provider is a customer, not the regulated party. Which license a stablecoin flow needs covers the separate money transmission question.
Section 3(h) also exempts three cases: direct transfers between two individuals with no intermediary, an individual moving funds between their own US and foreign accounts at the same parent company, and transactions through software or hardware wallets that keep the individual's own custody.
| Your situation | Exposure | What to plan |
|---|---|---|
| US company paying LatAm contractors, funded from USDT | Your provider must still be allowed to accept USDT from you after 2028 | Ask the provider; keep a USDC route ready |
| US company holding a USDT treasury balance | Off-ramp and exchange access in the US may narrow after 2028; accounting treatment may change | Plan a conversion path and ask your auditor about section 3(g) |
| Non-US fintech with no US customers, paying out in LatAm | Mostly outside the offer and sale rules if controls keep US persons out | Document location controls; watch section 8 designations |
| US platform collecting USDT from US customers | Directly in scope from January 18, 2027 | Run due diligence on the issuer's lawful-order capability now |
One line in the statute deserves a finance team's attention. Section 3(g) says a payment stablecoin not issued by a permitted issuer shall not be treated as cash or a cash equivalent for accounting purposes. A foreign issuer is, by definition, not permitted. USDC vs USDT for payments compares how the two issuers report reserves today.
Use this checklist with every exchange, custodian, and payout provider that touches USDT for you:
Treat it as an addendum to 30 due diligence questions for a stablecoin payments provider. Ask for answers in writing.
Several pieces are open as of October 2, 2026:
BlindPay is a payout and conversion layer, not a stablecoin issuer. It converts USDC and USDT into local currency and pays out over Pix, SPEI, ACH, and SWIFT (POBO/COBO), with KYC, KYB, and sanctions screening inside the payment flow. USDT payouts run on Ethereum, Polygon, Tempo, Solana, and Tron, per the supported chains reference.
Both tokens go through the same payout quote, with the token set per request, so a team that keeps a USDC route ready doesn't need a second integration.
Start with question 1 this week. Send it to every provider that holds or moves USDT for you, and write down who answers in writing.
The evidence examiners expect from automated risk monitoring: a 10-item evidence table, good vs poor practice, SAR timelines, RFIs, and a 30-day plan.
Blockchain payments are legal for businesses in the US, EU, UK, Brazil, and Mexico, under different rules. What each country regulates, as of October 2026.
Stablecoin transfers settle final in minutes and cannot be reversed. That finality proves custody at every step, but it also opens a fraud gap on the fiat side of the payment.